WILL IT BE FAIR TO RESTORE THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN?

Abstract

This article explores the debate over the possible reinstatement of the death penalty
in Uzbekistan in response to particularly serious crimes. According to a decree by
the first President of Uzbekistan, Islam Karimov, the death penalty was abolished in
Uzbekistan in 2008 and replaced with life imprisonment and long-term
imprisonment, but recent high-profile criminal cases have reignited discussions
about its return. Supporters argue that capital punishment serves as just retribution
for heinous crimes and an effective deterrent against recidivism. However,
opponents emphasize humanitarian principles, the risk of judicial errors, and
international legal obligations. Global statistics indicate that the death penalty does
not significantly reduce crime and often leads to wrongful convictions. Moreover,
maintaining a life sentence is economically more viable than capital punishment due
to legal expenses. Ultimately, the article concludes that the abolition of the death
penalty aligns with modern legal and ethical standards, reinforcing Uzbekistan’s
commitment to human rights and justice.